The Lane4 Journal of Excellence
Following its inauguration last year, the Lane4 Journal of Excellence brings together a blend of research-led articles and viewpoints into the field of high performance in business.
For Lane4, 'thought leadership' is about bringing new ideas into the field of high performance in business. These ideas can be generated through scientific research or experience in the field. The Lane4 Journal will support our drive to deliver consultancy that is ahead of the competition in both quality and originality.
"With the success of last year's journal, we're really proud to keep sharing our latest thinking and insights. Research has always been at the forefront of Lane4's drive to provide clients with interventions based on evidence and scientific rigour", explains Editor and Lane4 Co-founder Professor Graham Jones.
"We have big ambitions and aim to attract some of the leading thinkers in performance psychology and organisational development outside of Lane4, bringing the most up to date applied research to our clients every year."
2009 Topics include:
- Healthy Competition
- Adversity
- HR Communication Strategies
- The Leadership Brand
- Coaching Agility
- Work-Life Balance
- Leading in Tough Times
To order your complimentary copy email kelly.walsh@lane4.co.uk
2010-04-08
Can you handle it? Lane4 research results
'Can you handle it? Thriving on pressure in the workplace' reports the findings of Lane4's research survey.
Lane4 survey results: A Question of Trust
The results from Lane4's Trust Pulse Check found that one in seven UK workers distrust their line manager and 30% doubt leadership communication.
Lane4 survey results: What's motivating you?
The results are in! Lane4's latest survey shows that leaders are getting in the way of employees' motivation and that 90% of people think that their motivation is affected by their environment.
How the Best of the Best Get Better and Better (Harvard Business Review, June 2008, 123-127)
Until 1954, most people believed that a human being was incapable of running a mile in less than four minutes. But that very year, English miler Roger Bannister proved them wrong.